Wireframes, mockups and prototypes

The three design artefacts your supplier will show you before a single line of code is written.

By Kat Korson · Last reviewed May 2026

Eaglepedia mascot

A wireframe is a simple, low-detail sketch of a screen's layout and structure. A mockup is a static but visually complete design that adds colours, fonts and branding. A prototype is an interactive, clickable version that simulates how the finished software will behave.

Why a buyer meets all three

Early in a bespoke software project, before anything is built, your supplier designs the software on paper and on screen. They do this in stages, and at each stage they show you something to react to. Those somethings are wireframes, mockups and prototypes.

Designing first is deliberate. It is far cheaper and faster to change a sketch than to change working code, so a good supplier settles the design with you before the build begins. Knowing what each artefact is, and is not, lets you give useful feedback instead of guessing.

The progression from low to high fidelity

The three artefacts sit on a scale that designers call fidelity: how close something is to the finished article. Wireframes are low fidelity, mockups are higher, and prototypes are higher still. The Nielsen Norman Group, a long-standing authority on user experience, describes this low-to-high fidelity range as a core idea in design work.

  • Wireframe: a layout sketch. Grey boxes and placeholder text show where each element sits, with no colour or styling. Quick to draw and quick to change.
  • Mockup: a static, finished-looking design. The wireframe with real colours, fonts, images and branding applied. It looks like the product, but nothing moves.
  • Prototype: an interactive, clickable version. You can move through it and it responds, so you experience the flow rather than just viewing it.

Each step costs more effort than the one before, which is exactly why the work moves in that order: cheap, rough decisions are settled first, before time is spent making things look and feel polished.

Wireframe vs mockup vs prototype: side by side

The three differ on detail, interactivity, the question they answer and what you should check when you see one:

  Wireframe Mockup Prototype
Fidelity Low: greyscale boxes High: full visual design High: design plus behaviour
Interactive? No No, it is a static image Yes, you can click through it
Question it answers What goes where on the screen? What will it look like? How will it work to use?
What to check Is every task and field present and sensibly placed? Does the look match your brand and read clearly? Does the flow make sense and match how you work?

The Interaction Design Foundation, an established design-education publisher, makes the same distinction: a wireframe defines structure, a mockup adds the visual layer and a prototype adds interaction on top.

What to check at each stage

Each artefact is a chance to catch a problem while it is still cheap to fix. Review each one for what it is built to show, not for what it is not.

At wireframe stage, ignore how plain it looks: that is the point. Check that every screen, task and piece of information you need is there and in a logical place. At mockup stage, focus on the look: brand, colours, readability and tone. At prototype stage, walk through your real tasks and confirm the flow matches how your business actually works.

Sign-off matters here. Approving an artefact tells the supplier the design is settled enough to build on, so review it with the people who will use the software, not only managers.

How these differ from a proof of concept and an MVP

Wireframes, mockups and prototypes are easily confused with two other early-project terms, but they are a different kind of thing. All three are design artefacts: they show how software will look and behave, yet none of them is working software.

A proof of concept is an experiment that tests whether a risky idea is technically possible: it answers "can we build this?" A minimum viable product is a real, working first product, released to genuine users to learn whether they want it.

The order is design artefacts first, then a proof of concept if part of the project is technically uncertain, then the build, of which an MVP can be the first release. Prototypes and design work usually happen during the project's discovery phase, an early step in the wider software development lifecycle.

Seeing your software before it is built protects your budget Wireframes, mockups and prototypes let you correct course while changes are still cheap, long before code locks decisions in. Red Eagle Tech's bespoke software development service designs each project visually with you first, so you approve how the software will look and work before the build starts. If you would like to talk a project through, the form below is the place to start.

Frequently asked questions

A wireframe is a plain, low-detail sketch of where things sit on a screen, drawn in greys and boxes with no styling. A mockup takes that layout and adds the finished look: real colours, fonts, images and branding. A wireframe answers what goes where; a mockup answers what it will look like.

A mockup is a static picture: it shows the finished look of a screen but nothing happens when you click. A prototype is interactive: you can click through it and it responds, simulating how the real software will behave. A mockup shows the design; a prototype lets you try it.

Wireframes, mockups and prototypes are design artefacts: they show how software will look and behave, but none is working software. A proof of concept tests whether a risky idea is technically possible. A minimum viable product is a real, working first product released to genuine users. Design artefacts come first, before anything is built.

Not always. A small, simple project might go straight to a mockup. A larger or more complex one benefits from all three, moving from quick wireframes through mockups to a clickable prototype. Your supplier should explain which artefacts they plan to produce and why, so you know what you will be asked to review.
Kat Korson - Company Director at Red Eagle Tech

About the author

Kat Korson

Company Director

Company Director at Red Eagle Tech, leading our mission to make enterprise-grade technology accessible to businesses of all sizes. With a background spanning marketing, operations, and business development, I understand firsthand the challenges businesses face when trying to leverage technology for growth.

Read more about Kat

Discovery call

A friendly 15-minute video call with Kat to understand your needs. No preparation needed.

  • Discuss your project
  • Get honest advice
  • No obligation
Kat Korson, Founder of Red Eagle Tech

Kat Korson

Founder & Technical Director

Our team has 10+ years delivering software solutions for growing businesses across the UK.

Send us a message

Your information is secure. See our privacy policy.

Find us